ADHD and Autism Diagnosis Needs Treatment Access to Be Meaningful
Helen Macdonald responds to ombudsman's report on ADHD and autism care. Without treatment pathways, diagnoses remain hollow outcomes in England's struggling NHS system.

The Crisis Beyond Diagnosis
Recent findings from the parliamentary and health service ombudsman reveal a troubling reality in England's healthcare landscape. The ADHD and autism diagnosis situation has reached critical levels, with complaints soaring over 200% in the past five years. However, the most pressing issue extends far beyond the lengthy waiting lists and diagnostic delays. Helen Macdonald, speaking on behalf of the British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies (BABCP), highlights a fundamental problem: receiving an ADHD and autism diagnosis often means nothing without corresponding access to evidence-based treatment.
The Treatment Access Gap
Once individuals finally obtain their ADHD and autism diagnosis, they frequently discover a startling truth. The healthcare system provides the diagnosis but fails to deliver the necessary therapeutic interventions that follow. This disconnect represents one of the most frustrating outcomes for patients who have already endured years of waiting and the emotional toll of the diagnostic process itself.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) explicitly recommends cognitive behavioural therapy for managing anxiety and depression that frequently accompany neurodevelopmental conditions. For adults specifically diagnosed with ADHD, this therapeutic approach is supported by clinical evidence in particular contexts. Yet despite these clear clinical guidelines, the availability of such treatments remains severely limited across the NHS.
Workforce Shortages and Clinical Capacity
The core challenge stems from significant workforce shortages within mental health and neurodevelopmental services. Even in healthcare settings where clinical professionals recognize the necessity and efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy, the practical capacity to deliver these services simply does not exist. Therapists are overwhelmed, waiting lists extend for months or years, and patients requiring ADHD and autism diagnosis follow-up care are left in limbo.
This situation forces many individuals into an impossible position. Those with financial means turn to private practitioners, spending thousands of pounds for care that should be available through the NHS. Those without such resources are left to manage their conditions with minimal professional support, relying on self-help strategies and informal support networks that cannot replace structured therapeutic intervention.
A Hollow Outcome
The phrase that best encapsulates this crisis is simple yet powerful: a diagnosis without access to appropriate treatment is fundamentally hollow. Patients receive validation that their struggles have a clinical basis, yet are denied the tools and professional support needed to address those struggles effectively.
The BABCP has been documenting and advocating around these issues for years, providing evidence-based recommendations for systemic improvement. Their concerns have proven prescient, as the ombudsman's report now validates what practitioners and patients have known for quite some time. The system is broken not just at the diagnostic stage but critically at the treatment stage.
Moving Forward
Addressing this crisis requires comprehensive reform. Healthcare planners must recognize that ADHD and autism diagnosis is only the beginning of a patient's journey. Adequate funding must be allocated to expand the cognitive behavioural therapy workforce. Training programs need expansion to produce more qualified therapists. Treatment pathways must be established as standard practice rather than aspirational guidelines.
Helen Macdonald's intervention underscores what many healthcare professionals understand clearly: providing diagnosis without treatment access represents a failure of the healthcare system to fulfill its fundamental mission. It creates false hope and leaves vulnerable populations without the evidence-based interventions they require and deserve.
